fbpx

Tag Archive for Sci-Fi

Chemical Evolutions

 

It occurs to me that this point in time is a bit on the unusual side.  Now, I have no real expertise in this matter other than that fact that I read too d*mn much, and have a fascination with the history of medicine, but it seems to me that humans, as a species, have been self-medicating in one fashion or another for many thousands of years now.  Beer has been consumed by all ages as an alternative to water in many places where the water has been problematic to drink, over the counter remedies contained a host of addictive and what are now considered “recreational” substances from alcohol to opium to cocaine to radioactive bone shavings, you name it, we have consumed it, sometimes for fun, sometimes for necessity, sometimes to cure what ails us.

So it seems that this oft lamented tendency, this pursuit of this pill or that pill to change the way that we think, our anxieties, our inability to sit still or our unrelenting anger or any number of other issues, may not be a “new” tendency.  We have always been medicated.  The difference is that now we are medicated with a backstory, with chemicals that we can track and control and mix to precise doses.  We know what these chemicals will do and why, as opposed to just getting us “feeling better”.

So what if this new “neurotic” norm that keeps getting lamented in media and on mommy blogs and educational sites, what is this has always been the norm?  What if we’ve just been covering up our true “normal”.  What if what we think of as “normal” was just the medicated version of humanity? Now that we are medicating less in search of a “healthy norm” we are finding that what we thought was normal, stable, mellow, reasonable is just the by-product of our own need to feel better?

The very fine line

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150420/05585630727/fbi-united-airlines-shoot-messenger-after-security-researcher-discovers-vulnerabilities-airplane-computer-system.shtml

The above caught my attention the other day, in part because I have an ongoing fascination with transitional spaces.  Those grey areas which aren’t quite “good guy” and not quite “bad guy”.  Most of the ones I encounter are legal grey spaces (rather than moral ones).  A law or a rule has been placed in place that is ignored if the rulebreaker is working for the greater good, and enforced when the rulebreaker is operating with malicious intent.  Needless to say, this kind of inconsistent enforcement can become a problem, especially if clear secondary boundaries are not set.

Take (as a similar example) the bounties that companies like MSFT and Facebook place on finding security holes in their software.  There are potential criminal penalties for finding and exploiting these holes, but if you find one and are the first one to report it (I’m over simplifying here, I’m aware) there is often a bounty awarded.  In both cases, the act of hacking the software is technically illegal (again, oversimplifying), but the company chooses to reward one instance and persecute another (which makes sense, right?  One hack is by a good-guy, helping to make the software more secure, the other is the bad guy, exploiting the hack for personal gain).

But because of these inconsistencies, the laws get hard to enforce.  Law enforcement and the corporate interests may not align.  Hackers and crackers may switch hats with regularity, working on “white hat” projects and “black hat” projects simultaneously or in turn, depending where their interests lie and because of this, law enforcement tends to regard most (if not all) of them with equal suspicion, leading to incidents like the one above.