fbpx

Tag Archive for parents and videogames

The accent is on the *e*

The accent is on the *e*
I’m at the preschool today, thinking about voices. No, not in your
head type voices. I was listening to one of our participating parents
talking in a very thick accent and marvelling at the siblant way she
strung her words together. She’s from Russia, but the accent is not
what you might expect given the round thick tones used so commonly in
media.

Which got me thinking a bit deeper about language and
characterizations. One of the tools used in storytelling is the
stereotype. Love or hate them, stereotypes are a tool. They let you
set a readers expectations quickly and cleanly, they allow you a quick
connection to the reader that can then be fleshed out to suit your
story. When you break stereotype or archetype or fail to at least
give it a passing nod, you have to spend significantly more time on
exposition to bring your reader up to speed and to create that new
character in their mind.

Accents are the same way. They are a filmakers tool to set a location
to give us a backstory without having to give us an information dump
on the character. As an example, take the American accent used in
almost every film made overseas. It’s from Texas, and not only that,
but it is an overblown chariacture of a Texas accent. Accurate or
not, however, it makes the character distinct, gives you an instant
read on who they are, where they’re from and what their role in the
story is going to be. Something interesting to note, by the way is
that the closer the character is to the heart of the story, the closer
they are to the main character, the lighter that accent tends to be.

People 2.0

I’ve been hearing a lot about how things like the web and text messaging are keeping people from “face time” how we are all degenerating into a group of chair-ridden social degenerates who cannot spell, cannot speak, cannot even maintain eye contact in real-life social situations. That our children are going to grow up getting married on WOW and having virtual children rather than going to nightclubs, getting lit on drgs and booze and having unprotected sex like the previous generation was wont to do (if you believe the media, at any rate).

But the one thing people fail to take into account is that a very large percentage of the population is comprised of reasonably balanced people. There are addicts of every stripe, addicts for alcohol, for
sex, for videogames, for pr0n, for chocolate, for heroin, for soap operas, for Twitter, for Harry Potter, in fact, if it makes you feel good, if it makes *anybody* feel good, there’s probably someone out there who’s addicted to it.

But the majority of people, when they realise they have gotten hooked on something that is mucking up their life, they self-regulate. They limit their exposure, they set rules like, no drinking before 5pm, or, no TV on a school day. Sometimes it takes a little mucking about to get the balance right, sometimes you fall off the wagon, but you get up and get back to the balancing act again.

Thing is, social media and digital communication are not so different from any other type of communication. In place of reading facial expressions there are emoticons, hashtags, any number of ways to convey that emotion, and a recently savvy user can pick up on these just as quickly as a smile or a frown.

“But” you may say “but you can use those to lie. To say you are angry or sad with the intent of manipulating your reader.  BAD PEOPLE use those to trick kids into taking naked pictures of themselves and to get dates with people prettier than they are.”

“But” I say back “how us that different from what we do face to face? The false smiles and dishonest chuckles we have all grown up  practising as a part of everyday social graces?  It’s just as possible that the person you are meeting at the bar is actually half a million dollars in debt and has herpes, the fact that you’re meeting him or her face to face doesn’t change the fact that deception happens.”

It’s not such a difference to the experienced user. Someone who does their business online is going to be well versed in these forms of silent communication just like we can look at the misspellings in an email title and know if it’s spam or not.  Someone looking in from the outside, however, is going to see something else, they are going to miss the subtleties of repurposed semicolons and be blinded by the run-on nature of hashtag situationals.

So be tolerant of those who are as of yet unfamiliar with this new and subtler form of communication. Remember that this is a whole new language to them, like dropping a native Chinese speaker into a tribe
that speaks only Farsi. They will adapt, or be miserable, but the world will keep turning, one way or the other.  If you’ve already adapted, keep going.  If you’re two steps behind, you’re going to have to make the decision for yourself, do you *want* to take the plunge or stay dry?