fbpx

Tag Archive for facebook

Don’t be evil…

 

facebookfollies

Image courtesy: http://rocksimage.com/facebook-logo-wallpaper-47298/

 

Why don’t we trust Facebook to “not be evil” the way we trust (or seem to trust) Google?  Is it an outreach thing?  Is the faceless wall of Google less intimidating than the faceless wall of Facebook?

And now, we have the breaking (or broken) news emerging that Facebook has been experimenting on it’s users by hilighting posts in a specific stripe (depressing or uplifting, shall we generously say) to see how the readers will react.  But this kind of data collection is not new.  Not really.  Advertising agencies have spent decades testing out how their ads make people feel, they test  to see if the picture with the guy in the blue short sells more cookies than the picture of the guy in the red short (if you get deep into ad-psych you’ll find they’ve tested race, hairstyle, clothing style, background, should the person own a dog or a cat, etc. etc).

We do this kind of A/B testing in mobile apps all the time.  Know why so many icons on your phone have smiley, happy bobbleheads on them, even if they’re not in the game?  Yep.  We tested for that.  You like faces.  Go figure.

So I am given to wonder how deep this kerfluffle with Facebook goes.  Is this just a spin tactic layered over some garden-variety testing to see how users react to ad placements?  Or is it genuinely the kind of emotional manipulation that the headlines are touting?

 

 

 

The Trolls are in the Uncanny Valley

It’s popping up more and more in the common parlance, this idea of the “uncanny valley”.  Right now you think of it as a point where a person/living creature looks real, but something about it gives you the creeps, there is a bit missing that tells you that whatever it is isn’t alive.

I’ve started running across this more and more IRL, not so much in robot-analogues, but in RSS feeds and robo-calls.  You know when you get the recorded message from your credit card company and it *sounds* like a real person, but after a few responses you get shuttled to a real human and you can suddenly tell the difference?  You get it in online chat assistance as well, some of the companies seem to have a low-rent “Alice” style AI asking you questions so you can get directed to the proper individual/department.

And now, recently, I’ve started to run across this in blogs.  I have a couple that I follow on a semi-regular basis.  They deliver a copy of the new blogpost directly to my email whenever it goes up.  Which should be great right?  I never miss a post.

But having it come to your email causes a bit of a disconnect, especially if you are following someone fairly colloquial, who addresses their blogs directly to the members of the audience.  When it shows up in your email, it feels like she/he is speaking directly to YOU, rather than posting to the internet.  It feels…  It feels a bit creepy.  Especially when you pop over to the blog site itself and realize that, whatever response you might have posted, it’s going to be one in several hundred at best.  So that whatever response you might have had, you’re still just a fan with no actual connection to the poster.

I do wonder if this might be where some of the rabid fan hate comes from, this kind of text-based uncanny valley.  With increasingly rare exception, blogs are a monologue.  They are a writer speaking to the void.  Sure, you have some bloggers who make contact in the comments, but not terribly often.  So when you have a fan who feels they have made a one-on one connection, but when they attempt to interact through the comments system, or by tweeting, or FBing or instagramming, or whatever the point of contact is, they get lost in the noise.  They fall into that uncanny valley and so they LASH OUT.  What they felt, because of the medium and the delivery, was a dialog, has turned out to be just writing on a wall.