fbpx

Tag Archive for Science Fiction

Teeeeeeny weeeeeny Science

http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S1600577514025715

The fiction I write right now is almost exclusively science fiction, often with a cyberpunk or a nanotech element.  That hasn’t always been the case, I’ve done turns with low-fantasy and historical fantasy, but right now the things that interest me, the “what-ifs” that have potential are in the sciences.

So when I find something that relates directly to a what-if (in this case I’m building a world where nanotech-scale tools are prevalent) I do my digging to see where the technology actually is, and where it might go from here.

When you get to the nanoscale level, all kinds of interesting new requirements come into play.  You have to account for things like the temperature of the room, the amount of expansion in an instrument because of the heat generated by the bulb that illuminates your experiment area.  Things get very *very* precise and so developments in that precision because very important.

All of my science is informed.  I may choose to use a “pop-sci” version of that science, but that’s almost always a conscious decision to try to keep my stories more accessible, to try and keep them out of the realm of “hard” science fiction and so touch a broader audience.

Cybercrime and Transparency

 

Image courtesy kapersky.com

Obama Signs Executive Order Encouraging Private-Sector Companies To Share Cyber Security Information

Transparency is creeping ever closer.  I know people online bitch and moan about the lack thereof, but the truth of the matter seems to be that, inch by inch, policy by policy, transparency is seeping into our lives (whether we like it or not).  President Obama recently signed an executive order regarding the sharing of information between the govt. and private corporations with an eye towards combating cybercrime in a more wholesale fashion, which (for a change) pushes the latest steps in airing our undergarments to governmental/corporate collaboration (rather than exploring the boundaries of personal liberties).

But is a monolithic front to cybercrime really the most ideal solution?  Hackers (the really l33t ones at least) seem to be individualists, they have target preferences, unique ways of looking at problems that might not be easy to defend against as a single data-crunching system.  There is a certain amount of nimbleness required, which is why the bounty system (where corporations pay a bounty to programmers for each bug or hack reported and proven) seems to be as effective as it is, rather than engaging rooms full of people combing through the code.