fbpx

Archive for future

Chemical Evolutions

 

It occurs to me that this point in time is a bit on the unusual side.  Now, I have no real expertise in this matter other than that fact that I read too d*mn much, and have a fascination with the history of medicine, but it seems to me that humans, as a species, have been self-medicating in one fashion or another for many thousands of years now.  Beer has been consumed by all ages as an alternative to water in many places where the water has been problematic to drink, over the counter remedies contained a host of addictive and what are now considered “recreational” substances from alcohol to opium to cocaine to radioactive bone shavings, you name it, we have consumed it, sometimes for fun, sometimes for necessity, sometimes to cure what ails us.

So it seems that this oft lamented tendency, this pursuit of this pill or that pill to change the way that we think, our anxieties, our inability to sit still or our unrelenting anger or any number of other issues, may not be a “new” tendency.  We have always been medicated.  The difference is that now we are medicated with a backstory, with chemicals that we can track and control and mix to precise doses.  We know what these chemicals will do and why, as opposed to just getting us “feeling better”.

So what if this new “neurotic” norm that keeps getting lamented in media and on mommy blogs and educational sites, what is this has always been the norm?  What if we’ve just been covering up our true “normal”.  What if what we think of as “normal” was just the medicated version of humanity? Now that we are medicating less in search of a “healthy norm” we are finding that what we thought was normal, stable, mellow, reasonable is just the by-product of our own need to feel better?

Human Interface

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/204547-android-exploits-with-implanted-nfcs-whats-next

I’m not sure we will ever go to hard-core implantable/bionic tech without medical cause.  I’ll be honest about that.  I think the number of people who would be willing to lop off a limb or a leg to get better traction on a mountain, or a more perfect baseball swing, I think those people are going to exist, but as a small percentage, especially the way our current culture thinks and breathes.  It would take a major cultural shift to get bionics and bionic replacements in non-medical circumstances, to become commonplace.  (But since I write science fiction, I can imagine a world where exactly that has happened).

That said, I think that smaller implantable elements like these, ones that can simply be injected under the skin are going to become commonplace.  Right now one of my parents has no fewer than four separate “dongles” for work, each of which generates a unique, rotating passcode.  That parent also has keychain tabs for various reward accounts at specialty stores, a coded key for their car and an NFC tag for their office building.  Basically it’s about as awkward as trying to shove a baseball in your pocket.

Now imagine, if you will, a single chip, implanted under the skin, that can handle all of those.  You have an app on your phone that can generate the pass-codes if and only if the NFC chip agrees, pass your hand over the NFC reader at work and voila, the door opens for you.

The problem with these scenarios lies in the software, not the hardware.  Everyone who needs security also insists on proprietary setups.  This is why you need four different dongles, each custom dongle is from a different manufacturer and links to a different system of software.  Every company, every provider of security has their own tech, their own solution, so at the end of the day, you either need an all-in-one solution (like Mint does for your banking/investments, or ICQ used to do for your social media communications) or you’re going to end up riddled with tiny holes as each and every one of these companies injects you with their own (probably difficult to remove) custom NFC implantable.